|
Hurricane Evacuation Information
Download Our
Company Info

(Adobe PDF File)
(2.16 Mb)

Site Visits:

Last modified:
June 01, 2010 03:35 PM
©Soft-Tech Consulting
| |

Loss Mitigation Services
In the aftermath of hurricanes Katrina and Rita, many
property owners have found themselves struggling with their insurance companies
over the pre-storm condition of their property. Lacking sufficient
documentation of the pre-storm condition of their residential or commercial
property, many property owners are finding that their insurers denying storm
damage claims, citing a pre-existing condition. Equally as frequently, insurers
offset the value of damage claims by using depreciated values of the insured
property as a basis for claim adjustment. In cases where the pre-storm
condition of the property has been well documented, this has not been the case.
One of the primary arguments
made by insurance companies in denying damage claims in the aftermath of
hurricanes Katrina and Rita has been that the damage was “pre-existing”; the
result of long-term differential settlement. This is an easy argument for the
insurers to make due to the soil conditions of our community. It is equally
difficult for the individual property owner or their experts to refute such
claims after-the-fact. The best defense against claims of pre-existing damage
is thorough documentation of the existing condition.
Anyone who has lived in the
Greater New Orleans Metropolitan Area for any length of time is at least
somewhat familiar with settlement. In very general terms “settlement” and/or
“differential settlement” is the shifting of a structure caused by consolidation
(shrinking) and/or expansion (swelling) of the structure’s supporting soils.
Various types of foundation systems have been designed to address the problem of
settlement in compressible and expansive soils. Generally, foundation systems
supported in deeper soil layers (piles, drilled piers, etc.) perform better that
foundation systems supported in the upper soil layers (spread footings, chain
walls and masonry/block piers).
In most cases, a written
Engineer’s Report, which includes a detailed description of the property, a
relative elevation survey and photographic documentation, is sufficient to
establish a “baseline” or “snapshot” of the current condition of the property.
We recommend that the property be re-inspected every two years or so, or as
improvements are made to the property. A copy of the Engineer’s Report should
be provided to your insurer to have “on file” in the event of catastrophic
loss.
As you make repairs or
substantial improvements to your residential or business property, don’t allow
yourself to become caught in a situation where you are unable to provide proof
of the pre-existing condition of your property in the event of a catastrophic
loss.
Contact
Information

|

Current Fee Schedule

|

Payment Information

|
|